European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD)

Reach

2017 LTLS Question 22.1

"Of the following foreign and international organizations, which, if any, provided [the government / your team] with advice or assistance to support this initiative? (Please select all that apply.)"

3.9%
of respondents who answered this question selected the EBRD

Official Development Assistance

not available
committed for the period 2005 to 2013 to countries within the LTLS that had at least 1 respondent who reported working with the EBRD.

Insufficient data on official development assistance. EBRD provides other types of financing, which are not included.

Influence

2017 LTLS Question 22.5

"You indicated that the foreign and international organizations below provided {the government / your team } with advice or assistance. How influential were they on {Government of [Q1:Country]'s / your team's} decision to pursue this initiative?  For the purposes of this survey, we define influential as the power to change or affect the policy agenda."

Overall Performance

67.6%
of 2017 LTLS evaluations in which the EBRD was rated had a rating of "quite influential" or "very influential".

16
out of 35 partners who had at least 30 responses each in helpfulness and influence in AidData's 2017 LTLS.

1
change in rank from an adjusted 2014 ranking based on AidData's 2014 survey.

Ranking by Cohort

How did the EBRD do versus other development partners with at least 30 respondents in a particular cohort?

By Stakeholder

Government Officials: 13 out of 32

Development Partners: out of 19

CSO/NGO: ouf of 17

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any stakeholder cohort.

By Region

East Asia and Pacific: out of 15

Europe and Central Asia: 9 out of 14

Latin America and The Caribbean: out of 9

Middle East and North Africa: out of 5

South Asia: out of 9

Sub-Saharan Africa: out of 26

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any region.

By Sector

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any sector.

Economic: out of 20

Environment: out of 7

Governance: out of 16

Other: out of 17

Rural Dev: out of 7

Social/Health: out of 19

Helpfulness

2017 LTLS Question 22.2

"In your opinion, how helpful were each of the following organizations to the implementation of this initiative? For the purposes of this survey, we define helpful as being of assistance in implementing policy changes?"

Overall Performance

66.1%
of 2017 LTLS evaluations in which the EBRD was rated had a rating of "quite helpful" or "very helpful".

26
out of 35 partners who had at least 30 responses each in helpfulness and influence in AidData's 2017 LTLS.

-12
change in rank from an adjusted 2014 ranking based on AidData's 2014 survey.

Ranking by Cohort

How did the EBRD do versus other development partners with at least 30 respondents in a particular cohort?

By Stakeholder

Government Officials: 29 out of 31

Development Partners: out of 19

CSO/NGO: ouf of 15

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any stakeholder cohort.

By Region

East Asia and Pacific: out of 14

Europe and Central Asia: 7 out of 13

Latin America and The Caribbean: out of 9

Middle East and North Africa: out of 4

South Asia: out of 9

Sub-Saharan Africa: out of 26

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any region.

By Sector

the EBRD did not have 30 evaluations in any sector.

Economic: out of 20

Environment: out of 7

Governance: out of 16

Other: out of 16

Rural Dev: out of 7

Social/Health: out of 16

16
26
10
31
29
7
13
9