Anchoring Global Ambitions

Beijing’s Ports Financing and the Race for Maritime Dominance

New report and dataset explore China's shifting maritime strategy, tracking nearly $24 billion in Chinese official financing for projects at 168 ports in 90 countries from 2000 to 2025.

Coming Tuesday: New report, datasets tracking trillions in Chinese loans and grants

For media inquiries, contact Alex Wooley at awooley@aiddata.org and +1.757.585.9875

Brief: China's Lending in the UK

Dashboards

China's Development Finance

AidData's 2024 Listening to Leaders survey is in the field.

Frequently Asked Questions

Belt and Road Reboot

Beijing's Bid to De-Risk Its Global Infrastructure Initiative

The report draws upon AidData’s new, uniquely comprehensive dataset capturing 20,985 Chinese development finance projects across 165 countries worth $1.34 trillion from 2000-2021

Photo: Davide Monteleone

‍

Panel Discussion: Beijing's Public Diplomacy in East Asia and the Pacific

Watch the Recording

Balancing Risk and Reward

Who benefits from China's investments in Indonesia?

Full Report

Listening to Leaders 2025

Development cooperation over a decade of disruption

Full Report

Facebook Live

Investing in Kenya's People

AidData presented a new report last week in a virtual event co-hosted with Ambassador Kyle McCarter at the U.S. Embassy in Nairobi, Kenya.

Watch Now →

Interactive Feature
Listening to Leaders 2025: Coming Soon

Measure real impact

Geospatial Impact Evaluations measure intended and unintended impacts of development programs. Leveraging readily available data like satellite observations or household surveys, GIE methods establish a reliable counterfactual to measure impact - at a fraction of the time and cost of a "traditional" randomized control trial (RCT).

Methodological rigor

Like RCTs, GIEs can estimate the net effect of a specific program by comparing similar units where the only difference was an intervention, or treatment. Unlike RCTs, GIEs use precise geographic data to establish this counterfactual retroactively, eliminating the need to assign program participants into randomized treatment and control groups within the program design.

Learn more efficiently

GIEs can be completed in a fraction of the time and financial cost of an RCT by eliminating the need for customized data collection in treatment and control groups before, during and after the program.

See portfolio-wide insights

GIE methods are also flexible tools that can either be used to evaluate individual projects or project portfolios.  Whereas RCTs are often implemented in narrowly bounded settings, GIEs can be used with data for an entire country (or even multiple countries), which makes it possible to draw conclusions about impacts and cost effectiveness that are broadly generalizable.

Ascertain long-term impact, even in inaccessible places

Additionally, GIEs can be implemented remotely, retrospectively, and affordably, opening up new opportunities to measure long-run programmatic impacts, which is especially useful to evaluators working in conflict and fragile state settings.

China Research

Rigorous evidence from AidData's uniquely comprehensive data and analysis about the changing nature, scale, and scope of China’s overseas development program, its planet-scale impact, and how it is perceived in the Global South.

Harboring Global Ambitions

China's Ports Footprint and Implications for Future Overseas Naval Bases

Tracking financing to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Better data to help aid agencies, philanthropies, and partners in the Global South avoid missing the mark

Photo: UN Photo/Cia Pak

‍

March 26
#OneTribeOneDay
Give back & Pay it forward
Donate Today

U.S. House of Representatives Hearing

All roads lead to Beijing?

AidData's Executive Director Dr. Brad Parks provided testimony before the U.S. House Select Committee on Strategic Competition between the U.S. and the CCP.

Into the Breach

Will China Step Up as the U.S. Retreats on Global Development?

Drawing upon more than a decade of AidData’s research to provide objective, fact-based analysis of how the U.S. and China have traditionally supported development in low- and middle-income countries.

Policy Brief

Photo via Adobe Stock, used under the Standard license

Power Playbook

Beijing's bid to secure transition minerals

Tracking nearly $57 billion of Chinese official sector financing to understand how Beijing has expanded its control over key segments of the global supply chain for transition minerals

About the research

Photo by Mineral Vision via Adobe Stock, used under the Standard license

March 19, 2025

How Can Indo-Pacific Countries Bargain for Better Deals with Development Partners?

Join us in Washington, DC or online for what promises to be a lively panel discussion and question-and-answer session.

Into the Breach

Will China step up as the U.S. retreats on global development?

Drawing upon more than a decade of AidData’s research to provide objective, fact-based analysis of how the U.S. and China have traditionally supported development in low- and middle-income countries.

Photo via Adobe Stock, used under the Standard license

Power Playbook

Beijing's bid to secure overseas transition minerals

Tracking nearly $57 billion of Chinese official sector financing to understand how Beijing has expanded its control over key segments of the global supply chain for transition minerals

Photo by Mineral Vision via Adobe Stock, used under the Standard license

Find out when we release new courses

Subscribe to AidData's newsletter

Newsletter Signup

Navigating Global Development Finance

Leveraging AidData's expertise and resources to empower data-driven professionals

Updates

AidData's "Navigating Global Development Finance" online course is open for registration!

Archive

Selected newsletters

Programs

AidData has proven expertise in designing rigorous and replicable methods to analyze China's expanding portfolio of overseas investments and soft power activities—from infrastructure projects to public diplomacy initiatives. We organize convenings of leading policymakers and scholars; conduct outreach to media outlets worldwide; provide custom analysis to senior public sector decision-makers; and collaborate with an international network of researchers to publish peer-reviewed articles and books as well as influential policy reports, such as Chasing China, How China Collateralizes, Power Playbook, Anchoring Global Ambitions, Belt and Road Reboot, Banking on Beijing‍.

AidData has established itself as a leading innovator in new methods to quantify which economic and soft power tools China, Russia, and the U.S. use, with whom, and to what end. We have produced first-of-its-kind analysis to measure Beijing’s public diplomacy footprint in the Asia-Pacific and South and Central Asia; designed novel metrics to monitor the Kremlin’s ability to influence civic space, media resilience, and energy security in Europe and Eurasia; and convened thought leaders to understand U.S. strategic communications and foreign assistance options in an era of great power competition. AidData regularly provides advice, training, custom analytics, public-facing dashboards, policy reports, and data for government agencies, multilaterals, NGOs and think tanks to monitor and counter foreign influence.

Women’s economic empowerment is critical for the overall development of societies. Yet, understanding which policies and programs are most effective is incredibly difficult. AidData is putting its proven track record in geospatial data, machine learning, remote sensing, and impact evaluation methods—as well as deep subject matter expertise on the role of gender in development—to better measure and contextualize women’s economic empowerment. By combining household survey data and high-resolution satellite imagery, we can produce gender-disaggregated outcome measures at local scales and more nuanced insights about the effectiveness of gender-focused policy interventions in rural settings. Our analysis gives funders insight into how to increase future program impacts while addressing outcomes particularly important to women, including crop selection, household bargaining power, and intimate partner violence.

AidData is a recognized leader in geospatial impact evaluations (GIEs). Over the last ten years, we have led a wide-ranging, global effort to use causal inference tools and subnationally georeferenced data to measure program impacts. GIE methods are especially useful and cost-effective in under-evaluated sectors and settings where measuring outcomes over space and time is challenging. AidData has deployed GIEs to evaluate infrastructure, public health, land rights, irrigation programs, and more. We also use artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to build next-generation development outcome measures of crop productivity, food security, and local resilience to climate change. Finally, AidData’s free spatial data integration and extraction tool, GeoQuery, lowers the barriers to geospatial analysis by helping users more easily measure local conditions in data-poor environments.

AidData is a market leader in fielding regular surveys to 100,000 government, civil society, and private sector leaders across 140 developing countries. AidData triangulates information from its biennial surveys, snap polls, and interviews to produce public reports and bespoke analysis that help development agencies be more responsive to partner priorities and maximize their impact with Global South leaders. Our analysis regularly feeds into agency-wide evaluations and strategy reviews, as well as international standard-setting bodies, such as MOPAN, Paris21 and the OECD. Our team members advise both development agencies and Global South policy research organizations on how they can build stronger in-house capabilities to assess policy influence.

With its pioneering Tracking Underreported Financial Flows (TUFF) methodology, AidData shines a light on the activities of donors and lenders that do not fully participate in global reporting systems. We publish uniquely comprehensive and granular project-level datasets; create interactive dashboards and maps; and analyze the nature, scale, composition, and effects of underreported financial flows. We support government officials who need transparent data and tools to scrutinize incoming proposals and negotiate more favorable contracts. We are also engaged in a wide-ranging effort to understand the impacts of underreported development finance on environmental protection, public health, debt sustainability, socio-economic welfare, and governance.

History

AidData was founded when three organizations—William & Mary, Development Gateway, and Brigham Young University—grew frustrated with the informational status quo and came together together to provide the global development community with more granular and comprehensive data on foreign assistance projects worldwide.

A small core team of around eight staff initially focused their efforts on generating and publishing more sectorally- and spatially-precise data on bilateral and multilateral aid projects.

But AidData's activities and ambitions expanded and evolved over time. As we put more and better data into the public domain, demand for practical applications of the data sharply increased. AidData responded to this demand by refocusing our efforts on demonstrating the art of the possible with better data on development investments and outcomes.

AidData also began to place more emphasis on partnering with international development organizations to accelerate the use of our data by policymakers and practitioners. Since 2004, AidData has worked with more than 40 bilateral, multilateral, and foundation partners. Our global reach also expanded through in-country partnerships with more than 90 civil society organizations, line ministries, think tanks and universities in 21 different countries across Asia, Africa, and Latin America.

By 2016, AidData had more than quadrupled in size and was established as an independent research lab at William & Mary. Development Gateway and Brigham Young University remained engaged as strategic partners through the AidData Center for Development Policy.

About GeoQuery / Custom Data Requests

Custom Data Requests

GeoQuery does a lot, but not everything. You can submit your own shape files, GeoJSONs, or other requests here. Processing time will vary depending on the complexity and size of your data, and what data you request from us. Please note that we can only extract data that is already in GeoQuery, even if you provide us with a custom shape file. Additionally, we cannot do custom extracts for aid-related datasets. Please use the GeoQuery interface for this.

Before we process your request, you may receive a confirmation email from geo@aiddata.org to the account provided in the form below. All data or other communication will be sent to this email.

If you are looking for the GeoQuery tool, you can find it here: GeoQuery.org.

Submit a Custom Request

Max file size 2.5 MB.
Uploading...
fileuploaded.jpg
Upload failed. Max size for files is 10 MB.
Thank you for your custom boundary request! A member of our GeoQuery team will be in touch.
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Form Instructions

In order to help us expedite processing, please be as specific as possible. We may email you for further clarification if needed.

Notes on Specific Fields

Datasets and Parameters (Required)

In this text box, please provide us with a list of the data and the filters you would like us to provide in the extract. You can only request data currently in GeoQuery. Please provide as much detail as possible about the datasets in GeoQuery you would like extracted (for example, "World Bank Geocoded Aid Data v1.4.2, Sectors including Energy Generation and Supply, Mineral Resources and Mining"; "Precipitation (Yearly Average), Mean; Max and Min for each boundary; Years 1985 - 2014";). If you request "all data", we will provide all of the information in GeoQuery, including aggregated top-level aid information (i.e., all World Bank or GEF aid that has gone to a region in our database).

Custom Boundaries (Required)

Upload the boundary file to which you want data to be extracted. We currently accept JSON files or zipped shapefiles to represent boundaries. If you upload something other than polygons (i.e., points or lines), please let us know what buffer you need applied. Uploads are currently limited to 25mb; if your file exceeds this limit, please email us directly at geo@aiddata.org so we can arrange an alternative.